Flu 101 brought to you by MIT's CESF
 
Flu 101
  MIT Engineering Systems for Public Health: Decision-Making Tools for Healthy Living: Empowering the Individual to Reduce the Probability of Getting the Flu  

To keep up-to-date on all the latest, visit our news page!

> Read more

 

 
   
 

 

   
 
 

A Home Flu "Kit" to Empower Individuals and Families for Pandemic Flu

Stan Finkelstein
Center for Engineering Systems Fundamentals
Engineering Systems Division
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
& Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology

Shiva Prakash
Center for Engineering Systems Fundamentals
Engineering Systems Division
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
& Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology

James McDevitt
Department of Environmental Health
Exposure, Epidemiology and Risk Program
Harvard School of Public Health

Richard C. Larson
Center for Engineering Systems Fundamentals
Engineering Systems Division
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
& Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology

November 2009

Abstract:

Background
When a flu pandemic occurs, it can overwhelm the capacities of our hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, and emergency services. Most of the stricken will have to be cared for at home, and there is strong evidence that in-home caregivers bear a disproportionate risk of becoming infected. We focus on simple steps that in-home caregivers can take to reduce the chances that they and other household members will become infected from the stricken individual being cared for in the home.

Methods
We examined the feasibility that a portfolio of non-pharmaceutical remedies, easily implemented in the home would reduce the local spread of illness.

Results
Personal hygiene, common masks, and technologies including air filters and ultraviolet light each offer incremental benefits, and in combination are expected to reduce some of the risk that caregivers and other household members become infected.

Conclusions
In pandemics and even seasonal epidemics, seemingly small steps could literally mean the difference between life and death, especially for in-home caregivers at high risk.

> top


Engineering Responses to Pandemics

Richard C. Larson
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Karima R. Nigmatulina
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Astract: Focusing on pandemic influenza, this chapter approaches the planning for and
response to such a major worldwide health event as a complex engineering systems problem. Action-oriented analysis of pandemics requires a broad inclusion of academic disciplines since no one domain can cover a significant fraction of the problem. Numerous research papers and action plans have treated pandemics as purely medical happenings, focusing on hospitals, health care professionals, creation and distribution of vaccines and anti-virals, etc. But human behavior with regard to hygiene and social distancing constitutes a first-order partial brake or control of the spread and intensity of infection. Such behavioral options are “non-pharmaceutical interventions.” (NPIs) The chapter employs simple mathematical models to study alternative controls of infection, addressing a well-known parameter in epidemiology, R0, the “reproductive number,” defined as the mean number of new infections generated by an index case. Values of R0 greater than 1.0 usually indicate that the infection begins with exponential growth, the generation-to-generation growth rate being R0. R0 is broken down into constituent parts related to the frequency and intensity of human contacts, both partially under our control. It is suggested that any numerical value for R0 has little meaning outside the social context to which it pertains. Difference equation models are then employed to study the effects of heterogeneity of population social contact rates, the analysis showing that the disease tends to be driven by high frequency individuals. Related analyses show the futility of trying geographically to isolate the disease. Finally, the models are operated under a variety of assumptions related to social distancing and changes in hygienic behavior. The results are promising in terms of potentially reducing the total impact of the pandemic.

> top


White Paper On Novel H1N1: Prepared for the MIT Center for Engineering Systems Fundamentals (Revised July 27, 2009)

John M. Barry
Distinguished Scholar, Tulane University Center for Bioenvironmental Research
Member, Advisory Board, MIT Center for Engineering Systems Fundamentals

Astract: This paper is an historical and policy primer for one to prepare for a severe flu pandemic - which is virtually guaranteed to happen at some time in the future. The paper provides actionable knowledge, gleaned from past flu pandemics and from recent science, to reduce the chance of you and your loved ones from contracting the flu. The paper discusses both the new novel H1N1 flu virus and the more lethal H5 N1 ("bird flu") virus. In discussing the future of H1N1, the author says, "Three of the preceding four pandemics, 1889, 1918, and 1957, show clear evidence of some fairly intense but sporadic initial local outbreaks scattered around the world. The novel H1N1 virus seems thus far to be following the pattern of those three pandemics, and it seems highly likely that it will return in full flower." The author projects that a full fledged global pandemic could cut global GDP by up to 4 to 6 percent, and that companies must now prepare for supply chain disruptions, even if only the milder H1N1 becomes the prevalent flu. An individual's behavioral changes with social distancing and hygienic steps can dramatically reduce the chance of contracting the flu.

> top


Planning for a Flu Pandemic: Policies to Empower Individuals and Families

Shiva Prakash
Center for Engineering Systems Fundamentals
Engineering Systems Division
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Stan Finkelstein
Engineering Systems Division
Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Richard C. Larson
Center for Engineering Systems Fundamentals
Engineering Systems Division
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Astract: No one can predict how much sickness and loss of life will result if and when the next influenza pandemic occurs. Experts agree, the issue is not if it will occur, but when. Whatever that time is, such pandemic flu would likely overwhelm the capacities of our hospitals, clinics and emergency services. Most people ill with the flu will have to be cared for at home by family members and other trusted caregivers.

> top


Revisiting R0, the Basic Reproductive Number for Pandemic Influenza

Richard C. Larson
Center for Engineering Systems Fundamentals
Engineering Systems Division
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Astract: This paper focuses on a fundamental input parameter for most existing mathematical models of pandemic influenza, the ‘basic reproductive number R0,’ defined to be the mean number of new influenza infections created by a newly infected person in a population of all susceptible people. We argue that R0 is limited in policy and scientific value as is any single parameter attempting to characterize a complex probabilistic process. In particular, we demonstrate by simple logic that R0 does not exist as a separate ‘constant of a particular influenza,’ but rather its value is determined by social context and behavioral patterns as well as by the “physics’’ of the influenza virus. To the extent that R0 is useful, it is best viewed as an output of a modeling analysis, not an input. But with R0 being the mean of a random variable, much more information is contained in the entire probability distribution. With this view, we show – again by simple arguments – that R0 can be greater than 1.0 and still, contrary to popular belief, the probability of an exponentially growing pandemic may be arbitrarily small. Finally, we show that attempts to estimate R0 from data of previous pandemics is fraught with methodological complexities, due primarily to heterogeneities in the population that cause super-spreaders and socially active people to be the first propagators of the disease. Unless one is careful, statistical estimates of R0 based on early exponential growth of reported cases may be significantly upwardly biased.

> top


Stopping Pandemic Flu: Government and Community Interventions in a Multi-Community Model

Karima R. Nigmatulina
Operations Research Center
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Richard C. Larson
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Engineering Systems Division
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Astract: Focusing on mitigation strategies for global pandemic influenza, we use elementary mathematical models to evaluate the implementation and timing of intervention strategies such as travel restrictions, vaccination, social distancing and improved hygiene. A spreadsheet model of infection spread between several linked heterogeneous communities is based on analytical calculations and Monte Carlo simulations. Since human behavior will likely change during the course of a pandemic, thereby altering the dynamics of the disease, we incorporate a feedback parameter into our model to reflect altered behavior. Our results indicate that while a flu pandemic could be devastating; there are coping methods that when implemented quickly and correctly can significantly mitigate the severity of a global outbreak.

> top


Pandemic Flu: Yes, We Can Do Something About It!

Richard C. Larson
Center for Engineering Systems Fundamentals
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Astract: The emergence of influenza with virulence comparable to the famous 1918-1919 “Spanish Flu” has the potential to kill hundreds of millions of people worldwide. Should we find ourselves being forced to ‘live with the flu,’ it is imperative that we recognize that there are things that we can do – many simple – that may decrease the chance of our loved ones, our co-workers and ourselves becoming infected with the flu. The key is to decrease the number of new infections created by each newly infected person. And this relates to mathematical modeling of the disease, a very simple example of which is shown here.

> top


Simple Models of Influenza Progression within a Heterogeneous Population

Richard C. Larson
Center for Engineering Systems Fundamentals
Engineering Systems Division
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Astract: The focus of this ‘OR framing paper’ is to introduce the OR community to the need for new mathematical modeling of an influenza pandemic and its control. By reviewing relevant history and literature, one key concern that emerges relates to how a population’s heterogeneity may affect disease progression. Another is to explore within a modeling framework ‘social distancing’ as a disease progression control method, where social distancing refers to steps aimed at reducing the frequency and intensity of daily human to human contacts. To depict social contact behavior of a heterogeneous population susceptible to infection, a non-homogeneous probabilistic mixing model is developed. Partitioning the population of susceptibles into subgroups, based on frequency of daily human contacts and infection propensities, a stylistic difference equation model is then developed depicting the day-to-day evolution of the disease. This simple model is then used to develop a preliminary set of results. Two key findings are (1) early exponential growth of the disease may be dominated by susceptibles with high human contact frequencies and may not be indicative of the general population’s susceptibility to the disease; and (2) social distancing may be an effective non-medical way to limit and perhaps even eradicate the disease. Much more decision-focused research needs to be done before any of these preliminary findings may be used in practice.

> top

papers